Televisions · comparison
Samsung QA65QN95BAW vs Sony XR-65X95K: 65-inch LCD TVs
If you buy through a link on this page, the retailer may pay us a commission.
The Samsung QA65QN95BAW costs about $17 a year less to run at 32¢/kWh.
Prices
Samsung QA65QN95BAW
No price at the shops checked: The Good Guys and Appliances Online.
Prices checked 10 Sept 2026.
Sony XR-65X95K
No price at the shops checked: The Good Guys and Appliances Online.
Prices checked 10 Sept 2026.
Side by side
| SamsungQA65QN95BAW | SonyXR-65X95K | |
|---|---|---|
| Buying | ||
| Best price | not listed | not listed |
| Specifications | ||
| Screen technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | Neo QLED (Mini-LED) | Full-array LED |
| Series | Samsung QN9x Neo QLED | Sony X9x |
| Screen size | 65-inch (164 cm) | 65-inch (164 cm) |
| Native refresh | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Made in | Vietnam | Malaysia |
| Registration no. | ATV4866 | ATV4879 |
| Running costs at 32¢/kWh | ||
| Energy stars | 2.5 ★ | 2 ★ |
| kWh a year | 781 | 835 |
| Cost a year | $250 | $267 |
How we compare
Specifications are from the Australian Government's energy-rating database; prices are from the retailers shown, on the dates shown. Running costs apply 32¢/kWh to the government's labelled annual energy figure. The energy figure assumes 10 hours of viewing a day, the labelled test basis. Full pages: Samsung QA65QN95BAW · Sony XR-65X95K · or every current model.